Guilt and Creativity in the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer

Guilt and Creativity in the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Guilt and Creativity in the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer

Robert Mitchell

University of Manchester: Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities (2012)


The late Middles Ages saw the development in Europe of increasingly complex, ambitious, and self-conscious forms of creative literature. In the works of poets such as Dante, Petrarch and Chaucer new models of authorship and poetic identity were being explored, new kinds of philosophical and aesthetic value attributed to literary discourse. But these creative developments also brought with them new dangers and tensions, a sense of guilt and uncertainty about the value of creative literature, especially in relation to the dominant religious values of late medieval culture. In this thesis I explore how these doubts and tensions find expression in Chaucer’s poetry, not only as a negative, constraining influence, but also as something which contributes to the shape and meaning of poetry itself.


I argue that as Chaucer develops his own expansive, questioning poetics in The House of Fameand The Canterbury Tales, he problematises the principle of allegory on which the legitimacy of literary discourse was primarily based in medieval culture and the final fragments of The Canterbury Tales see Chaucer struggling, increasingly, to reconcile the boldness and independence of his poetic vision with the demands of his faith. This struggle, which emerges most strongly and polemically in the final fragments, I argue, runs in subtle and creative forms throughout the whole of Chaucer’s work. By seeing Chaucer in this light as a poet not of fixed, but of conflicted and vacillating intentions – a poet productively caught drawn between ‘game’ and ‘earnest’, radical ironies and Boethian truths – I attempt to account, in a holistic manner, for the major dichotomies that characterise both his work and its critical reception.

Watch the video: Middle English: Languages of the World: Introductory Overviews (May 2022).


  1. Tapani

    This brilliant idea has to be purposely

  2. Kajizragore

    I do not regret that I wasted a couple of minutes reading. Write more often, I will certainly stop by to read something new.

  3. Kana

    This message is simply matchless ;)

  4. Yogi

    Of course you're right. There is something in this and I like this idea, I completely agree with you.

  5. Cheikh

    I know a site with answers to your question.

  6. Ashquar

    Congratulations, I think this is a great idea

  7. Jusida

    Toko a few from which you can laugh!

  8. Dutaxe

    You are not wrong, are you

Write a message